RxDoctor Payments Data

Malik Kahook, MD

Glaucoma Specialist · Aurora, CONPI 1578537122

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by ownership interests: $1,237,781 of the $1,343,570 with a category attached, or 92.1%. NEW World Medical,inc. accounts for 93.2% of it on its own, with 7 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2022 at $571,892 and has fallen 99.9% since, to $464 in 2025.

$1,343,570in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 134 payments — averaging $10,027 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • NEW World Medical,inc.$1.3M
  • Alcon$58K
  • Alcon Research LLC$19K
  • AbbVie$10K
  • Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$2K
  • Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC$2K
  • plus $237 from 2 others
$28,308in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 11 payments — averaging $2573.41 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AbbVie$28K
$1,050,970in ownership & investment interests, 2019–2025

Across 10 payments — averaging $105,097 each. An ownership or investment interest held by the physician or an immediate family member.

  • NEW World Medical,inc.$1.1M

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$29,1382%
  • Travel & lodging$14,8471%
  • Food & beverage$5,2910%
  • Ownership interest$1,237,78192%
  • Other$56,5134%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
NEW World Medical,inc.83$1,252,712
Alcon8$58,358
Alcon Research LLC15$18,799
AbbVie18$9,509
Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.3$2,190
Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC3$1,766
Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.3$134
The Cameron-ehlen Group, Inc.1$103

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

Too few glaucoma specialist providers in Coloradoto place this figure against a meaningful peer group, so we don't.

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$42,647
Medicare patients
185
Services billed
765

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
LumiganBimatoprost47$30,114
SimbrinzaBrinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart43$14,487
Latanoprost206$3,519
CombiganBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol11$3,284
Alphagan PBrimonidine Tartrate13$2,368
Brimonidine Tartrate54$1,877
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat82$1,700
Dorzolamide Hcl49$1,407
Timolol Maleate21$212

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieLumigan, Combigan, Alphagan P$9,509$35,76571 claims
AlconSimbrinza$58,358$14,48743 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. There are too few glaucoma specialist providers in Coloradoon file to place this against a meaningful peer group, so we don't.

Other glaucoma specialist in Aurora

See the full list for Colorado

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →