RxDoctor Payments Data

Mahmoud Eslami-Farsani, MD

Cardiology · Santa Ana, CANPI 1487659637

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 98.0% of the total across 242 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 35 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 15.0% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations.

$5,341in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 242 payments — averaging $22.07 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novartis$801
  • ZOLL Services LLC (a/k/a ZOLL Lifecor Corp)$582
  • Medtronic$454
  • Biotronik Inc.$409
  • Johnson & Johnson$389
  • Amgen$385
  • plus $2K from 29 others
$405,080in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 26 payments — averaging $15,580 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Edwards Lifesciences$405K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$5,23498%
  • Education$1072%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$5,341 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 156 cardiology providers in California.

See all cardiology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$803,004
Medicare patients
1,470
Services billed
5,699

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban414$523,186
XareltoRivaroxaban231$300,324
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan79$70,893
Repatha SureclickEvolocumab42$49,828
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol33$38,348
Praluent PenAlirocumab48$33,509
BrilintaTicagrelor32$26,222
JardianceEmpagliflozin14$16,737
VascepaIcosapent Ethyl20$14,766
OzempicSemaglutide12$9,624
Metoprolol Succinate636$9,450
EdarbiAzilsartan Medoxomil12$9,400
NexlizetBempedoic Acid/Ezetimibe11$8,384
Rosuvastatin Calcium409$7,582
JanuviaSitagliptin Phosphate11$7,082

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$209$523,186414 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$389$300,324231 claims
NovartisEntresto$801$70,89379 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$51$16,73714 claims
Novo NordiskOzempic$145$9,62412 claims
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.Nexlizet$16$8,38411 claims
MerckJanuvia$194$7,08211 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 156 cardiology providers in California.

Other cardiology in Santa Ana

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →