RxDoctor Payments Data

Lindsey Kent

Gerontology · Grand Rapids, MINPI 1740986322

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 100.0% of the total across 86 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. 11 manufacturers reported payments, led by Boehringer Ingelheim at 25.5% of the total.

$3,016in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 86 payments — averaging $35.07 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Boehringer Ingelheim$770
  • Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$673
  • Medtronic$369
  • Novo Nordisk$368
  • Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.$275
  • Dexcom, Inc.$194
  • plus $367 from 5 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$3,016100%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,016 in reported general payments places this provider in the 85th percentile of 279 gerontology providers in Michigan.

See all gerontology providers in Michigan

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$16,172
Medicare patients
99
Services billed
238

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
MounjaroTirzepatide113$141,877
TrulicityDulaglutide81$112,176
JardianceEmpagliflozin31$44,314
OzempicSemaglutide35$37,466
Lantus SolostarInsulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog102$15,856
Toujeo SolostarInsulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog19$14,693
Humalog Kwikpen U-100Insulin Lispro26$12,610
Novolog FlexpenInsulin Aspart23$11,847
Gvoke Hypopen 2-PackGlucagon17$10,484
Ultra-Fine Mini Pen NeedlePen Needle, Diabetic20$3,383
Ultra-Fine Short Pen NeedlePen Needle, Diabetic12$2,450
Nano 2nd Gen Pen NeedlePen Needle, Diabetic14$2,183
Pioglitazone Hcl38$1,005
Metformin Hcl ErMetformin Hcl40$941
Metformin Hcl19$312

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Lilly USA, LLCMounjaro, Trulicity$29$254,053194 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$770$44,31431 claims
Novo NordiskOzempic$368$37,46635 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 85th percentile of 279 gerontology providers in Michigan.

Other gerontology in Grand Rapids

See the full list for Michigan

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →