RxDoctor Payments Data

Leroy Pacheco, MD

Rheumatology · Albuquerque, NMNPI 1568438752

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by food and beverage: $6,077 of the $8,376 with a category attached, or 72.6%. It is spread thinly across 28 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 23.7%.

$8,376in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 336 payments — averaging $24.93 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • UCB Biosciences Inc.$2K
  • Amgen$1K
  • AbbVie$956
  • UCB, Inc.$788
  • Johnson & Johnson$640
  • AstraZeneca$512
  • plus $2K from 22 others
$2,444,946in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 220 payments — averaging $11,113 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • UCB SA$1.1M
  • Eli Lilly$432K
  • AbbVie$293K
  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC$199K
  • Novartis$122K
  • Biogen$87K
  • plus $246K from 10 others

What the payments were for

  • Travel & lodging$1,70120%
  • Food & beverage$6,07773%
  • Education$5987%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

How this compares

$8,376 in reported general payments places this provider in the 85th percentile of 44 rheumatology providers in New Mexico.

See all rheumatology providers in New Mexico

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$2,320,779
Medicare patients
408
Services billed
171,910

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EnbrelEtanercept72$668,416
Enbrel SureclickEtanercept74$639,336
Humira(Cf) PenAdalimumab67$578,774
Orencia ClickjectAbatacept69$448,695
Humira PenAdalimumab49$413,549
Xeljanz XrTofacitinib Citrate21$159,789
Actemra ActpenTocilizumab28$143,302
BenlystaBelimumab30$141,384
RinvoqUpadacitinib18$119,134
Taltz AutoinjectorIxekizumab13$90,781
ActemraTocilizumab14$64,883
Amjevita(Cf) AutoinjectorAdalimumab-Atto19$37,189
OxycontinOxycodone Hcl23$28,671
MethotrexateMethotrexate Sodium688$16,198
Hydrocodone-AcetaminophenHydrocodone/Acetaminophen414$15,259

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AmgenEnbrel$1,045$668,41672 claims
GSKBenlysta$167$141,38430 claims
AbbVieRinvoq$956$119,13418 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 85th percentile of 44 rheumatology providers in New Mexico.

Other rheumatology in Albuquerque

See the full list for New Mexico

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →