RxDoctor Payments Data

Lauren Graham

Dermatology · Birmingham, ALNPI 1780977553

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $40,908 of the $45,419 with a category attached, or 90.1%. 13 manufacturers reported payments, led by Astrazeneca UK Limited at 57.9% of the total. 2025 is the largest year on record at $35,821, 4.9 times the $7,315 reported in 2019.

$45,419in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 54 payments — averaging $841.10 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Astrazeneca UK Limited$26K
  • Boehringer Ingelheim$16K
  • UCB SA$2K
  • Biogen$1K
  • Pfizer$502
  • Novartis$196
  • plus $261 from 7 others
$540,039in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 170 payments — averaging $3176.70 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Pfizer$361K
  • Argenx US, Inc.$147K
  • Regeneron$32K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$40,90890%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$3501%
  • Travel & lodging$2,6426%
  • Food & beverage$1,5193%

General payments by program year

19
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$45,419 in reported general payments places this provider in the 85th percentile of 168 dermatology providers in Alabama.

See all dermatology providers in Alabama

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$65,388
Medicare patients
346
Services billed
1,497

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Gamunex-CImmune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 4671$1,026,417
Gammagard LiquidImmun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov5072$865,156
OctagamImmun Globg(Igg)/Malt/Iga Ov5030$765,527
PrivigenImmun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-5041$665,469
GammaplexImmun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga 0-5045$443,197
Dupixent PenDupilumab36$128,830
OtezlaApremilast26$120,604
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens)Secukinumab14$97,502
Cosentyx Unoready PenSecukinumab12$83,508
Taltz AutoinjectorIxekizumab12$77,676
Dupixent SyringeDupilumab15$53,625
Mycophenolate Mofetil22$5,177
Dapsone61$3,274
Tacrolimus37$2,612
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate51$1,926

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerOctagam$502$765,52730 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 85th percentile of 168 dermatology providers in Alabama.

Other dermatology in Birmingham

See the full list for Alabama

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →