RxDoctor Payments Data

Kristen Rice, MD

Hematology & Oncology · San Diego, CANPI 1558542845

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by education: $355 of the $475 with a category attached, or 74.8%. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. accounts for 68.4% of it on its own, with 6 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $355 and has fallen 73.2% since, to $95 in 2025. That places this record below the midpoint for hematology & oncology clinicians in CA, where the typical reported total is $3,371.

$475in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 7 payments — averaging $67.85 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Medical Device Business Services, Inc.$325
  • Medexus Pharma, Inc.$59
  • Tempus AI, Inc$24
  • Johnson & Johnson$20
  • Exelixis Inc.$18
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.$16
  • plus $12 from 1 others
$43,543in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 15 payments — averaging $2902.86 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AbbVie$32K
  • Incyte Corporation$12K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$12025%
  • Education$35575%

General payments by program year

19
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

How this compares

$475 in reported general payments places this provider in the 20th percentile of 1,363 hematology & oncology providers in California.

See all hematology & oncology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$1,237,536
Medicare patients
231
Services billed
48,825

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
BrukinsaZanubrutinib19$293,014
CalquenceAcalabrutinib Maleate12$186,223
NinlaroIxazomib Citrate13$158,542
SprycelDasatinib12$122,101
Imatinib Mesylate30$56,145
EliquisApixaban24$16,837
OxycontinOxycodone Hcl11$8,399
Anastrozole93$1,655
Exemestane11$992
Hydroxyurea28$729
Letrozole30$725
Ibandronate Sodium21$656
Gabapentin39$465
Alendronate Sodium14$273
Prochlorperazine Maleate27$268

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$12$16,83724 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 20th percentile of 1,363 hematology & oncology providers in California.

Other hematology & oncology in San Diego

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →