RxDoctor Payments Data

Kavita Sarin, MD

Dermatology · Stanford, CANPI 1851565956

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — grants (56.8%), consulting fees and education — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 7 manufacturers reported payments, led by Genentech, Inc. at 56.8% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2021 at $20,130 and has fallen 75.3% since, to $4,974 in 2025. Among dermatology clinicians in CA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$64,992in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 14 payments — averaging $4642.32 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Genentech, Inc.$37K
  • UCB GmbH$9K
  • Almirall LLC$8K
  • LEO Pharma AS$6K
  • Springworks Therapeutics, Inc.$5K
  • Pfizer$31
  • plus $24 from 1 others
$299,300in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 3 payments — averaging $99,767 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • UCB SA$200K
  • LEO Pharma AS$99K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$28,00643%
  • Grants$36,93257%
  • Food & beverage$240%
  • Education$310%

General payments by program year

20
21
22
23
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Genentech, Inc.2$36,932
UCB GmbH4$9,130
Almirall LLC1$7,700
LEO Pharma AS3$6,226
Springworks Therapeutics, Inc.1$4,950
Pfizer2$31
AstraZeneca1$24

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$64,992 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 1,875 dermatology providers in California.

See all dermatology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$76,367
Medicare patients
210
Services billed
1,041

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Doxepin Hcl12$864
Fluorouracil15$837
Clindamycin Phosphate16$475
Ketoconazole26$401
Clobetasol Propionate15$349
Triamcinolone Acetonide20$200
MethotrexateMethotrexate Sodium20$160
Hydrocortisone17$101
Mupirocin12$88
Sulfamethoxazole-TrimethoprimSulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim12$20

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Other dermatology in Stanford

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →