RxDoctor Payments Data

Justin Love, PA

Medical · Loma Linda, CANPI 1104006741

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — speaking fees (57.1%), consulting fees and travel and lodging — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 24 manufacturers reported payments, led by Sanofi at 34.9% of the total. 2025 is the largest year on record at $228,348, more than ten times the $13,347 reported in 2021. Among medical clinicians in CA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$552,700in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 887 payments — averaging $623.11 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Sanofi$193K
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.$83K
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.$65K
  • AbbVie$53K
  • LEO Pharma Inc.$43K
  • Lilly USA, LLC$35K
  • plus $82K from 18 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$116,54021%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$315,48357%
  • Travel & lodging$97,99118%
  • Food & beverage$22,1334%
  • Education$5540%

General payments by program year

21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$552,700 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 2,087 medical providers in California.

See all medical providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$148,457
Medicare patients
543
Services billed
2,724

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Skyrizi PenRisankizumab-Rzaa18$370,506
Dupixent PenDupilumab79$307,008
Cosentyx Unoready PenSecukinumab17$207,263
SotyktuDeucravacitinib12$75,003
OtezlaApremilast11$55,571
Dupixent SyringeDupilumab11$41,658
ZoryveRoflumilast33$28,569
Tacrolimus65$17,968
Fluorouracil215$17,785
Fluocinonide143$5,689
Clindamycin Phosphate89$3,947
Ketoconazole181$3,141
Doxycycline Hyclate79$2,798
Metronidazole44$2,663
Clobetasol Propionate35$1,169

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.Sotyktu$4,573$75,00312 claims
AmgenOtezla$63$55,57111 claims
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.Zoryve$64,925$28,56933 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 2,087 medical providers in California.

Other medical in Loma Linda

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →