RxDoctor Payments Data

Josue Nunez

Gerontology · Chicago, ILNPI 1962850719

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 100.0% of the total across 46 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 15 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 14.0% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations.

$1,299in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 46 payments — averaging $28.23 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novo Nordisk$182
  • Madrigal Pharmaceuticals$149
  • GSK$130
  • Exelixis Inc.$121
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$112
  • Exact Sciences$107
  • plus $498 from 9 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$1,299100%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$1,299 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 180 gerontology providers in Illinois.

See all gerontology providers in Illinois

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$10,083
Medicare patients
51
Services billed
102

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
JanuviaSitagliptin Phosphate50$67,474
OzempicSemaglutide25$29,648
JardianceEmpagliflozin19$25,288
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog13$10,039
Lantus SolostarInsulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog16$5,216
Albuterol Sulfate HfaAlbuterol Sulfate43$1,869
Hydrocodone-AcetaminophenHydrocodone/Acetaminophen55$1,744
Nifedipine ErNifedipine36$1,733
Atorvastatin Calcium198$1,375
Losartan Potassium104$942
Gabapentin52$772
Metformin Hcl93$771
Ultra-Fine Mini Pen NeedlePen Needle, Diabetic13$738
Alcohol PadsAlcohol Antiseptic Pads11$670
Lisinopril61$591

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
MerckJanuvia$87$67,47450 claims
Novo NordiskOzempic$182$29,64825 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$70$25,28819 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 180 gerontology providers in Illinois.

Other gerontology in Chicago

See the full list for Illinois

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →