RxDoctor Payments Data

Joon-Yi Kang, MD

Clinical Neurophysiology · Baltimore, MDNPI 1518293695

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $3,880 of the $5,641 with a category attached, or 68.8%. Eisai Inc. accounts for 83.4% of it on its own, with 5 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2021 at $4,763 and has fallen 99.3% since, to $31 in 2024.

$5,641in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 17 payments — averaging $331.81 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Eisai Inc.$5K
  • Neuropace, Inc.$503
  • SK Life Science, Inc.$220
  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc.$116
  • Medtronic$54
  • UCB, Inc.$42
$462,192in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 58 payments — averaging $7968.83 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • SK Life Science, Inc.$373K
  • Eisai Inc.$61K
  • Medtronic$28K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$3,88069%
  • Travel & lodging$96817%
  • Food & beverage$79314%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

Too few clinical neurophysiology providers in Marylandto place this figure against a meaningful peer group, so we don't.

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$19,730
Medicare patients
82
Services billed
163

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
XcopriCenobamate63$135,039
BriviactBrivaracetam24$51,487
Clobazam54$18,918
NayzilamMidazolam14$13,177
VimpatLacosamide18$13,032
Lacosamide93$10,168
Levetiracetam82$5,280
Divalproex Sodium15$1,389
Lamotrigine38$685
Levetiracetam ErLevetiracetam13$442
Topiramate17$262
Zonisamide15$217
Clonazepam21$207
Lorazepam13$86

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
SK Life Science, Inc.Xcopri$220$135,03963 claims
UCB, Inc.Briviact, Nayzilam, Vimpat$42$77,69756 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. There are too few clinical neurophysiology providers in Marylandon file to place this against a meaningful peer group, so we don't.

Other clinical neurophysiology in Baltimore

See the full list for Maryland

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →