RxDoctor Payments Data

Joie Russo, MD

Obstetrics · Encino, CANPI 1619988532

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by food and beverage: $5,996 of the $8,219 with a category attached, or 73.0%. 28 manufacturers reported payments, led by Mimedx Group, Inc. at 26.8% of the total. 2025 is the largest year on record at $2,511, 4.8 times the $523 reported in 2019. Among obstetrics clinicians in CA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$8,219in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 341 payments — averaging $24.10 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Mimedx Group, Inc.$2K
  • AbbVie$2K
  • Pfizer$752
  • Therapeuticsmd, Inc.$488
  • Exeltis, USA Inc.$437
  • Mayne Pharma Commercial LLC$382
  • plus $2K from 22 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$2,20027%
  • Food & beverage$5,99673%
  • Education$230%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$8,219 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 119 obstetrics providers in California.

See all obstetrics providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$50,050
Medicare patients
258
Services billed
509

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
PremproEstrogen,con/M-Progest Acet15$6,151
Estradiol (Twice Weekly)Estradiol40$4,004
Estradiol75$3,939
YuvafemEstradiol21$3,926
Estradiol-Norethindrone AcetatEstradiol/Norethindrone Acet27$2,523
Estradiol (Once Weekly)Estradiol18$1,680
ProgesteroneProgesterone, Micronized30$933
Nitrofurantoin Mono-MacroNitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst13$828
DottiEstradiol11$704
Clobetasol Propionate21$698
JinteliNorethindrone Ac/Eth Estradiol13$427
ValacyclovirValacyclovir Hcl12$378
Acyclovir14$208
Nystatin12$136

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerPrempro$752$6,15115 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 119 obstetrics providers in California.

Other obstetrics in Encino

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →