RxDoctor Payments Data

John Ip, MD

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Lansing, MINPI 1326049032

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $64,675 of the $79,607 with a category attached, or 81.2%. Abbott accounts for 98.4% of it on its own, with 14 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2020 at $27,212 and has fallen 99.7% since, to $81 in 2024.

$79,607in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 226 payments — averaging $352.24 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Abbott$78K
  • Novartis$433
  • Medtronic$226
  • Johnson & Johnson$152
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$143
  • Boston Scientific$93
  • plus $250 from 9 others
$688,859in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 280 payments — averaging $2460.21 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Abbott$499K
  • Novartis$102K
  • Medtronic$70K
  • Elutia, Inc.$17K
  • Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc.$2K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$64,67581%
  • Travel & lodging$10,85814%
  • Food & beverage$4,0745%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$79,607 in reported general payments places this provider in the 85th percentile of 105 clinical cardiac electrophysiology providers in Michigan.

See all clinical cardiac electrophysiology providers in Michigan

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$11,979
Medicare patients
249
Services billed
348

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban91$106,001
XareltoRivaroxaban21$32,751
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan11$16,779
Dofetilide20$2,753
Amiodarone Hcl30$1,093
Metoprolol Succinate28$591
SotalolSotalol Hcl21$404
Metoprolol Tartrate47$399
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd)Diltiazem Hcl11$291
Rosuvastatin Calcium13$223
Carvedilol13$206
Furosemide16$128
Amlodipine Besylate16$127

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$13$106,00191 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$152$32,75121 claims
NovartisEntresto$433$16,77911 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 85th percentile of 105 clinical cardiac electrophysiology providers in Michigan.

Other clinical cardiac electrophysiology in Lansing

See the full list for Michigan

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →