RxDoctor Payments Data

Jay Mattheis, MD

Ophthalmology · Loma Linda, CANPI 1154311058

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by speaking fees: $109,809 of the $176,323 with a category attached, or 62.3%. 20 manufacturers reported payments, led by Novartis at 25.3% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $120,725 and has fallen 99.5% since, to $621 in 2025. Among ophthalmology clinicians in CA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$176,323in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 406 payments — averaging $434.29 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novartis$45K
  • Shire North American Group Inc$42K
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc.$25K
  • Biotissue Holdings Inc.$23K
  • Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$20K
  • Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC$10K
  • plus $11K from 14 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$28,80516%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$109,80962%
  • Travel & lodging$26,87215%
  • Food & beverage$10,8376%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$176,323 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 2,513 ophthalmology providers in California.

See all ophthalmology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$136,154
Medicare patients
623
Services billed
1,601

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
XiidraLifitegrast260$285,265
LumiganBimatoprost75$39,299
RocklatanNetarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost35$25,689
Restasis MultidoseCyclosporine32$25,225
SimbrinzaBrinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart68$24,695
RestasisCyclosporine26$20,996
Brimonidine Tartrate419$18,811
Cyclosporine36$16,824
VyzultaLatanoprostene Bunod30$13,821
RhopressaNetarsudil Mesylate21$13,051
Alphagan PBrimonidine Tartrate29$11,928
Latanoprost1,126$10,135
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat471$6,899
EysuvisLoteprednol Etabonate13$6,238
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide/Timolol/Pf39$6,130

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.Xiidra, Vyzulta$579$299,086290 claims
AbbVieLumigan, Restasis Multidose, Restasis, Alphagan P$307$97,448162 claims
Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Rocklatan, Rhopressa$20,258$38,74156 claims
AlconSimbrinza$343$24,69568 claims
Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Eysuvis$9,476$6,23813 claims
Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLCLoteprednol Etabonate$10,195$4,18736 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 2,513 ophthalmology providers in California.

Other ophthalmology in Loma Linda

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →