RxDoctor Payments Data

James Oujiri, MD

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Milwaukee, WINPI 1134187412

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — consulting fees (39.3%), travel and lodging and food and beverage — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 13 manufacturers reported payments, led by Atricure, Inc. at 46.0% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2024 at $6,522 and has fallen 90.2% since, to $641 in 2025.

$17,288in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 98 payments — averaging $176.41 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Atricure, Inc.$8K
  • Boston Scientific$6K
  • Medtronic$3K
  • Abbott$159
  • Novo Nordisk$86
  • Cardiva Medical, Inc.$77
  • plus $208 from 7 others
$70,371in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 43 payments — averaging $1636.54 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Abbott$70K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$6,80039%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$2,00012%
  • Travel & lodging$4,61327%
  • Food & beverage$3,87522%

General payments by program year

19
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$17,288 in reported general payments places this provider in the 60th percentile of 78 clinical cardiac electrophysiology providers in Wisconsin.

See all clinical cardiac electrophysiology providers in Wisconsin

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$164,757
Medicare patients
1,464
Services billed
2,802

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban635$784,402
XareltoRivaroxaban98$133,993
MultaqDronedarone Hcl32$43,009
Dofetilide116$19,762
Metoprolol Succinate562$9,225
Flecainide Acetate171$7,776
Mexiletine Hcl23$3,746
Amiodarone Hcl261$3,213
SotalolSotalol Hcl110$2,632
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd)Diltiazem Hcl63$1,098
Warfarin Sodium77$651
ClopidogrelClopidogrel Bisulfate80$618
Carvedilol38$441
Mupirocin34$339
Metoprolol Tartrate42$270

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$20$784,402635 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$41$133,99398 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 60th percentile of 78 clinical cardiac electrophysiology providers in Wisconsin.

Other clinical cardiac electrophysiology in Milwaukee

See the full list for Wisconsin

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →