RxDoctor Payments Data

James Jenkins, MD

Interventional Cardiology · New Orleans, LANPI 1851321996

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $211,147 of the $234,995 with a category attached, or 89.9%. Abbott accounts for 95.1% of it on its own, with 28 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2023 at $79,021 and has fallen 97.9% since, to $1,676 in 2025. Among interventional cardiology clinicians in LA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$234,995in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 307 payments — averaging $765.46 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Abbott$223K
  • Edwards Lifesciences$4K
  • Abiomed$2K
  • Boston Scientific$1K
  • Philips North America LLC$697
  • Medtronic$686
  • plus $2K from 23 others
$988,260in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 227 payments — averaging $4353.57 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Edwards Lifesciences$337K
  • Abbott$211K
  • Recor Medical Inc$168K
  • Cardiovascular Systems Inc.$137K
  • Angiodynamics, Inc.$43K
  • Inspiremd Ltd$39K
  • plus $53K from 3 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$211,14790%
  • Grants$270%
  • Travel & lodging$16,4937%
  • Food & beverage$7,2193%
  • Entertainment$1090%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$234,995 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 171 interventional cardiology providers in Louisiana.

See all interventional cardiology providers in Louisiana

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$98,031
Medicare patients
417
Services billed
769

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban14$9,771
ClopidogrelClopidogrel Bisulfate30$356
Atorvastatin Calcium16$144
Prednisone12$14

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$76$9,77114 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 171 interventional cardiology providers in Louisiana.

Other interventional cardiology in New Orleans

See the full list for Louisiana

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →