RxDoctor Payments Data

Jafar Koupaie, MD

Procedural Dermatology · Riverside, CANPI 1508940644

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 100.0% of the total across 150 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. 22 manufacturers reported payments, led by AbbVie at 32.1% of the total.

$3,788in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 150 payments — averaging $25.25 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AbbVie$1K
  • Amgen$413
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.$390
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC$302
  • LEO Pharma Inc.$286
  • Novartis$226
  • plus $955 from 16 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$3,788100%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,788 in reported general payments places this provider in the 60th percentile of 108 procedural dermatology providers in California.

See all procedural dermatology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$115,236
Medicare patients
341
Services billed
1,215

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Dupixent PenDupilumab59$232,457
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens)Secukinumab17$127,224
OtezlaApremilast21$101,605
Dupixent SyringeDupilumab13$46,031
OpzeluraRuxolitinib Phosphate11$28,007
Calcipotriene29$5,740
Clobetasol Propionate116$3,899
Triamcinolone Acetonide125$2,243
Ketoconazole95$1,573
Hydrocortisone91$1,286
Doxycycline Hyclate46$1,203
Cephalexin32$1,191
Fluorouracil20$1,129
Metronidazole22$984
Hydroxyzine Hcl123$913

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AmgenOtezla$413$101,60521 claims
Incyte CorporationOpzelura$28$28,00711 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 60th percentile of 108 procedural dermatology providers in California.

Other procedural dermatology in Riverside

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →