RxDoctor Payments Data

Irina Volosko, DO

Glaucoma Specialist · Austin, TXNPI 1023520624

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by food and beverage: $6,676 of the $10,569 with a category attached, or 63.2%. 24 manufacturers reported payments, led by AbbVie at 29.2% of the total.

$10,569in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 138 payments — averaging $76.59 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AbbVie$3K
  • Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC$2K
  • Alcon$1K
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.$579
  • NEW World Medical,inc.$418
  • Rxsight Inc$377
  • plus $3K from 18 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$2,20021%
  • Travel & lodging$1,53114%
  • Food & beverage$6,67663%
  • Education$180%
  • Entertainment$1441%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$10,569 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 31 glaucoma specialist providers in Texas.

See all glaucoma specialist providers in Texas

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$104,559
Medicare patients
287
Services billed
1,025

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
RocklatanNetarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost107$53,671
RestasisCyclosporine16$22,900
LumiganBimatoprost49$22,796
SimbrinzaBrinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart40$14,094
VyzultaLatanoprostene Bunod23$11,205
Brimonidine Tartrate-TimololBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol61$10,635
Brimonidine Tartrate137$6,830
Latanoprost437$5,202
CombiganBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol17$4,635
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat150$2,408
Timolol Maleate143$1,694
Pilocarpine Hcl32$1,496
Dorzolamide Hcl71$1,445
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide/Timolol/Pf13$1,304
Prednisolone Acetate25$835

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieRestasis, Lumigan, Combigan$3,089$50,33082 claims
AlconSimbrinza$1,478$14,09440 claims
Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.Vyzulta$579$11,20523 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 31 glaucoma specialist providers in Texas.

Other glaucoma specialist in Austin

See the full list for Texas

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →