RxDoctor Payments Data

Gerald Walman, MD

Ophthalmology · Sun City, AZNPI 1730251836

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by food and beverage: $2,763 of the $3,145 with a category attached, or 87.9%. It is spread thinly across 18 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 11.6% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations. Reporting peaked in 2022 at $981 and has fallen 53.3% since, to $458 in 2025.

$3,145in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 47 payments — averaging $66.91 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$365
  • Notal Vision, Inc.$330
  • Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC$321
  • Alcon$306
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc.$287
  • Glaukos Corporation$270
  • plus $1K from 12 others
$1,722,472in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 351 payments — averaging $4907.33 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AbbVie$1.6M
  • Glaukos Corporation$79K
  • Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$27K
  • Shire North American Group Inc$5K

What the payments were for

  • Speaking & faculty fees$38112%
  • Food & beverage$2,76388%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,145 in reported general payments places this provider in the 65th percentile of 310 ophthalmology providers in Arizona.

See all ophthalmology providers in Arizona

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$166,191
Medicare patients
421
Services billed
1,261

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
LumiganBimatoprost55$35,206
RocklatanNetarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost12$8,170
Prednisolone Acetate131$7,102
CombiganBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol12$3,482
Travoprost19$2,566
Latanoprost252$1,891
Loteprednol Etabonate14$1,884
Dorzolamide Hcl54$1,296
Ketorolac Tromethamine68$1,201
Ofloxacin127$1,200
Timolol Maleate69$739
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat46$656
ErythromycinErythromycin Base41$449
Acetazolamide14$320
Brimonidine Tartrate31$266

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieLumigan, Combigan$234$38,68867 claims
Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLCLoteprednol Etabonate$321$1,88414 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 65th percentile of 310 ophthalmology providers in Arizona.

Other ophthalmology in Sun City

See the full list for Arizona

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →