RxDoctor Payments Data

Edward Martin, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Tulsa, OKNPI 1982674719

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 99.0% of the total across 189 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 30 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 17.2% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations.

$3,617in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 189 payments — averaging $19.14 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Pfizer$623
  • Boston Scientific$217
  • Merck$212
  • AstraZeneca$208
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$207
  • Bayer$196
  • plus $2K from 24 others
$4,393in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 1 payment — averaging $4393.20 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Merck$4K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$3,58199%
  • Education$361%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,617 in reported general payments places this provider in the 55th percentile of 164 cardiovascular disease providers in Oklahoma.

See all cardiovascular disease providers in Oklahoma

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$153,848
Medicare patients
1,066
Services billed
2,458

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan317$346,683
JardianceEmpagliflozin382$338,453
EliquisApixaban298$326,872
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol135$136,172
XareltoRivaroxaban90$78,911
Repatha SureclickEvolocumab91$67,335
VascepaIcosapent Ethyl53$28,210
NexlizetBempedoic Acid/Ezetimibe23$18,194
Ezetimibe578$12,378
Atorvastatin Calcium784$10,943
LivaloPitavastatin Calcium12$9,110
Rosuvastatin Calcium545$8,169
EdarbiAzilsartan Medoxomil17$7,434
Olmesartan Medoxomil171$6,462
Icosapent Ethyl19$4,278

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
NovartisEntresto$156$346,683317 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$124$338,453382 claims
PfizerEliquis$623$326,872298 claims
AstraZenecaFarxiga$208$136,172135 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$58$78,91190 claims
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.Nexlizet$153$18,19423 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 55th percentile of 164 cardiovascular disease providers in Oklahoma.

Other cardiovascular disease in Tulsa

See the full list for Oklahoma

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →