RxDoctor Payments Data

Diane Brackin, NP

Gerontology · Fishers, INNPI 1730579525

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — consulting fees (47.5%), food and beverage and travel and lodging — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 26 manufacturers reported payments, led by United Therapeutics Corporation at 42.2% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2024 at $8,327 and has fallen 85.4% since, to $1,215 in 2025. Among gerontology clinicians in IN with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$13,494in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 181 payments — averaging $74.55 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • United Therapeutics Corporation$6K
  • Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.$5K
  • Bayer$523
  • Abbott$340
  • AstraZeneca$319
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.$218
  • plus $1K from 20 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$6,40847%
  • Travel & lodging$2,40518%
  • Food & beverage$4,52434%
  • Education$1571%

General payments by program year

21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$13,494 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 230 gerontology providers in Indiana.

See all gerontology providers in Indiana

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$11,668
Medicare patients
39
Services billed
178

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
UptraviSelexipag109$2,478,783
OpsumitMacitentan93$1,157,039
Tyvaso DpiTreprostinil46$1,060,962
Orenitram ErTreprostinil Diolamine83$682,726
OpsynviMacitentan/Tadalafil22$279,802
LetairisAmbrisentan13$168,488
AdempasRiociguat11$146,199
Tadalafil228$130,887
Ambrisentan30$62,901
TadliqTadalafil11$39,474
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol19$18,857
Sildenafil Citrate48$16,016
Potassium Chloride124$3,909
Torsemide118$3,522
Amlodipine Besylate30$463

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.Uptravi, Opsumit, Opsynvi$5,060$3,915,624224 claims
BayerAdempas$523$146,19911 claims
AstraZenecaFarxiga$319$18,85719 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 230 gerontology providers in Indiana.

Other gerontology in Fishers

See the full list for Indiana

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →