RxDoctor Payments Data

Diana Shechtman

Optometrist · Miami, FLNPI 1710052089

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — consulting fees (52.7%), speaking fees and food and beverage — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 36 manufacturers reported payments, led by Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. at 51.2% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2020 at $17,297 and has fallen 59.9% since, to $6,930 in 2025. Among optometrist clinicians in FL with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$78,190in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 223 payments — averaging $350.63 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.$40K
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc$18K
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.$3K
  • NEW World Medical,inc.$3K
  • Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$2K
  • AbbVie$2K
  • plus $11K from 30 others
$92,030in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 5 payments — averaging $18,406 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AbbVie$92K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$41,19853%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$22,12528%
  • Travel & lodging$1,7872%
  • Food & beverage$10,41813%
  • Education$2,0563%
  • Entertainment$6061%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$78,190 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 3,166 optometrist providers in Florida.

See all optometrist providers in Florida

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$12,477
Medicare patients
58
Services billed
155

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
SimbrinzaBrinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart11$2,153
Latanoprost165$1,150
Timolol Maleate80$626
Brimonidine Tartrate13$134
Neomycin-Polymyxin-DexamethNeomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha15$110
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat11$44

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AlconSimbrinza$1,301$2,15311 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 3,166 optometrist providers in Florida.

Other optometrist in Miami

See the full list for Florida

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →