RxDoctor Payments Data

Derrick Fansler, MD

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Colorado Springs, CONPI 1760626519

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 100.0% of the total across 64 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. 14 manufacturers reported payments, led by Boston Scientific at 44.9% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $1,327 and has fallen 91.1% since, to $119 in 2025. That places this record below the midpoint for clinical cardiac electrophysiology clinicians in CO, where the typical reported total is $11,587.

$3,084in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 64 payments — averaging $48.19 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Boston Scientific$1K
  • Abbott$758
  • Medtronic$240
  • Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc.$157
  • Biosense Webster, Inc.$143
  • Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC$129
  • plus $272 from 8 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$3,084100%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,084 in reported general payments places this provider in the 20th percentile of 66 clinical cardiac electrophysiology providers in Colorado.

See all clinical cardiac electrophysiology providers in Colorado

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$152,806
Medicare patients
1,270
Services billed
3,265

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban430$617,799
XareltoRivaroxaban88$124,477
MultaqDronedarone Hcl30$61,280
Metoprolol Succinate516$7,989
SotalolSotalol Hcl160$4,128
Dofetilide14$4,072
Flecainide Acetate74$3,952
Nebivolol Hcl22$2,404
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd)Diltiazem Hcl51$1,476
Amiodarone Hcl47$711
Carvedilol58$481

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$37$617,799430 claims
Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLCMultaq$129$61,28030 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 20th percentile of 66 clinical cardiac electrophysiology providers in Colorado.

Other clinical cardiac electrophysiology in Colorado Springs

See the full list for Colorado

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →