RxDoctor Payments Data

David Vanderweele, MD

Medical Oncology · Chicago, ILNPI 1689846834

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $22,320 of the $30,351 with a category attached, or 73.5%. Bayer accounts for 67.8% of it on its own, with 6 other manufacturers making up the rest. 2025 is the largest year on record at $9,645, more than ten times the $407 reported in 2019.

$30,351in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 48 payments — averaging $632.32 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Bayer$21K
  • Exelixis Inc.$5K
  • Pfizer$2K
  • Clovis Oncology, Inc.$2K
  • Sanofi$407
  • AstraZeneca$124
  • plus $91 from 1 others
$1,097,307in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 43 payments — averaging $25,519 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Novartis$545K
  • Genentech, Inc.$301K
  • AstraZeneca$229K
  • Pfizer$22K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$22,32074%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$3,96013%
  • Travel & lodging$2,4898%
  • Food & beverage$1,5835%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Bayer27$20,572
Exelixis Inc.11$5,452
Pfizer2$2,205
Clovis Oncology, Inc.1$1,500
Sanofi4$407
AstraZeneca1$124
Genentech, Inc.2$91

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$30,351 in reported general payments places this provider in the 85th percentile of 144 medical oncology providers in Illinois.

See all medical oncology providers in Illinois

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$2,222,818
Medicare patients
537
Services billed
79,008

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
NubeqaDarolutamide74$914,688
CabometyxCabozantinib S-Malate36$745,069
XtandiEnzalutamide44$563,360
OrgovyxRelugolix162$430,395
Abiraterone Acetate161$332,925
InlytaAxitinib15$217,778
Tamsulosin Hcl28$862
Prednisone200$804
Prochlorperazine Maleate16$134
Dexamethasone14$118
Gabapentin28$113
Ibuprofen11$11

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
BayerNubeqa$20,572$914,68874 claims
Exelixis Inc.Cabometyx$5,452$745,06936 claims
PfizerInlyta$2,205$217,77815 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 85th percentile of 144 medical oncology providers in Illinois.

Other medical oncology in Chicago

See the full list for Illinois

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →