RxDoctor Payments Data

David Shavelle, MD

Interventional Cardiology · Long Beach, CANPI 1154315919

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $33,497 of the $39,418 with a category attached, or 85.0%. 20 manufacturers reported payments, led by Abbott at 57.2% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2024 at $21,514 and has fallen 57.9% since, to $9,058 in 2025.

$39,418in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 104 payments — averaging $379.02 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Abbott$23K
  • Edwards Lifesciences$16K
  • Boston Scientific$342
  • Abiomed$190
  • Penumbra, Inc.$166
  • Medtronic$100
  • plus $452 from 14 others
$233,916in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 59 payments — averaging $3964.68 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Penumbra, Inc.$208K
  • Abbott$20K
  • Accriva Diagnostics Inc.$7K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$33,49785%
  • Grants$1000%
  • Travel & lodging$2,7007%
  • Food & beverage$3,1228%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$39,418 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 585 interventional cardiology providers in California.

See all interventional cardiology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$134,248
Medicare patients
360
Services billed
1,040

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban102$115,589
XareltoRivaroxaban29$40,530
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan36$33,325
BrilintaTicagrelor31$28,153
Repatha SureclickEvolocumab25$14,770
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol14$12,394
Metoprolol Succinate89$1,073
Atorvastatin Calcium116$1,027
Losartan Potassium68$893
Carvedilol64$597
Digoxin15$459
Bumetanide14$376
Amlodipine Besylate42$363
Isosorbide Mononitrate ErIsosorbide Mononitrate22$333
ClopidogrelClopidogrel Bisulfate28$289

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AstraZenecaBrilinta, Farxiga$24$40,54745 claims
NovartisEntresto$21$33,32536 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 585 interventional cardiology providers in California.

Other interventional cardiology in Long Beach

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →