RxDoctor Payments Data

David Miklos

Hematology · Stanford, CANPI 1982751053

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $61,280 of the $90,232 with a category attached, or 67.9%. 21 manufacturers reported payments, led by Gilead at 58.0% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $30,981 and has fallen 62.1% since, to $11,755 in 2025.

$90,232in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 142 payments — averaging $635.44 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Gilead$52K
  • Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation$10K
  • EUSA Pharma (US) LLC$6K
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$5K
  • Bristol Myers Squibb$5K
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.$3K
  • plus $8K from 15 others
$10,403,448in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 278 payments — averaging $37,422 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Gilead$7.8M
  • Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation$2.1M
  • Regeneron$291K
  • Pharmacyclics LLC, An Abbvie Company$163K
  • Novartis$70K
  • Bristol Myers Squibb$25K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$61,28068%
  • Travel & lodging$23,34826%
  • Food & beverage$5,6056%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$90,232 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 178 hematology providers in California.

See all hematology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$65,923
Medicare patients
104
Services billed
440

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
ImbruvicaIbrutinib18$276,727
CalquenceAcalabrutinib Maleate12$163,099
Gammagard LiquidImmun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov5018$135,898
Posaconazole17$38,027
Atovaquone24$15,893
Acyclovir143$2,510
Sulfamethoxazole-TrimethoprimSulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim172$1,610
Levetiracetam11$505
Ondansetron Hcl20$199
Prednisone15$191
Allopurinol28$161
Lorazepam20$157
Pantoprazole Sodium11$41

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AstraZenecaCalquence$96$163,09912 claims
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.Gammagard Liquid$2,640$135,89818 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 178 hematology providers in California.

Other hematology in Stanford

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →