RxDoctor Payments Data

Danielle Sterrenberg, MD

Hematology & Oncology · Los Angeles, CANPI 1023243748

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by speaking fees: $100,345 of the $136,925 with a category attached, or 73.3%. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. accounts for 72.5% of it on its own, with 7 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $43,530 and has fallen 99.9% since, to $31 in 2025. Among hematology & oncology clinicians in CA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$136,925in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 160 payments — averaging $855.78 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Puma Biotechnology, Inc.$99K
  • Gilead$35K
  • Seagen Inc.$1K
  • Immunomedics, Inc.$1K
  • AstraZeneca$178
  • Johnson & Johnson$24
  • plus $28 from 2 others
$371,971in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 46 payments — averaging $8086.33 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Tesaro, Inc.$214K
  • Seagen Inc.$77K
  • GSK$54K
  • Eli Lilly$26K
  • AbbVie$1K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$17,74013%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$100,34573%
  • Travel & lodging$15,63111%
  • Food & beverage$3,1842%
  • Education$240%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Puma Biotechnology, Inc.124$99,219
Gilead27$35,251
Seagen Inc.1$1,225
Immunomedics, Inc.1$1,000
AstraZeneca4$178
Johnson & Johnson1$24
AbbVie1$16
Pfizer1$12

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$136,925 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 1,363 hematology & oncology providers in California.

See all hematology & oncology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$152,637
Medicare patients
337
Services billed
1,565

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
VerzenioAbemaciclib31$474,718
RevlimidLenalidomide24$390,202
IbrancePalbociclib19$296,402
Lenalidomide22$247,607
KisqaliRibociclib Succinate15$218,973
LynparzaOlaparib12$157,604
EliquisApixaban33$28,310
Everolimus17$20,557
XareltoRivaroxaban11$13,594
Exemestane25$4,376
YuvafemEstradiol14$2,662
Anastrozole130$2,165
Tamoxifen Citrate58$941
Letrozole25$742
Ondansetron Hcl20$308

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerIbrance, Eliquis$12$324,71252 claims
AstraZenecaLynparza$178$157,60412 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$24$13,59411 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 1,363 hematology & oncology providers in California.

Other hematology & oncology in Los Angeles

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →