RxDoctor Payments Data

Christopher Chow, MD

Internal Medicine · Northridge, CANPI 1528024122

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 99.1% of the total across 609 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 54 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 19.0% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations. Among internal medicine clinicians in CA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$12,552in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 609 payments — averaging $20.61 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AbbVie$2K
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc.$1K
  • Amgen$891
  • Johnson & Johnson$846
  • Lilly USA, LLC$785
  • Boehringer Ingelheim$574
  • plus $6K from 48 others
$9,342,111in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 1,835 payments — averaging $5091.07 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Eli Lilly$7.7M
  • American Regent$826K
  • Novo Nordisk AS$689K
  • Astellas Pharma Global Development$67K
  • Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc.$49K
  • Gilead$7K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$12,43599%
  • Education$1171%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$12,552 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 13,581 internal medicine providers in California.

See all internal medicine providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$269,124
Medicare patients
464
Services billed
2,823

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
MounjaroTirzepatide83$102,860
OzempicSemaglutide76$76,612
EliquisApixaban44$55,499
JardianceEmpagliflozin42$52,914
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol30$32,444
RexultiBrexpiprazole16$26,742
VascepaIcosapent Ethyl24$18,031
BenicarOlmesartan Medoxomil18$16,441
MyrbetriqMirabegron26$15,818
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog23$14,070
DapagliflozinDapagliflozin Propanediol14$11,814
Diclofenac Sodium58$11,539
Trelegy ElliptaFluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter12$10,615
XareltoRivaroxaban12$8,413
MeloxicamMeloxicam, Submicronized19$7,611

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Lilly USA, LLCMounjaro$785$102,86083 claims
Novo NordiskOzempic$217$76,61276 claims
PfizerEliquis, Premarin, Paxlovid$449$64,257105 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$574$52,91442 claims
AstraZenecaFarxiga$471$32,44430 claims
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.Rexulti$314$26,74216 claims
Daiichi Sankyo Inc.Benicar$1,381$16,44118 claims
Astellas Pharma US IncMyrbetriq$216$15,81826 claims
GSKTrelegy Ellipta$426$10,61512 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$846$8,41312 claims
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.Trintellix$205$7,08112 claims
AbbVieSynthroid$2,383$6,31868 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 13,581 internal medicine providers in California.

Other internal medicine in Northridge

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →