RxDoctor Payments Data

Christina Yeon, MD

Hematology & Oncology · South Pasadena, CANPI 1235186354

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $9,595 of the $10,868 with a category attached, or 88.3%. 16 manufacturers reported payments, led by AstraZeneca at 54.2% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $7,636 and has fallen 99.7% since, to $21 in 2025.

$10,868in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 37 payments — averaging $293.73 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AstraZeneca$6K
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc.$4K
  • Merck$101
  • Puma Biotechnology, Inc.$68
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc$57
  • Pfizer$55
  • plus $229 from 10 others
$10,225in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 3 payments — averaging $3408.23 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Pfizer$10K
  • Merck$225

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$9,59588%
  • Travel & lodging$1972%
  • Food & beverage$9849%
  • Education$921%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$10,868 in reported general payments places this provider in the 65th percentile of 1,363 hematology & oncology providers in California.

See all hematology & oncology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$1,520,169
Medicare patients
281
Services billed
63,998

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
VerzenioAbemaciclib13$208,550
NubeqaDarolutamide13$177,359
FemaraLetrozole12$10,302
EliquisApixaban15$8,745
Exemestane20$7,725
Anastrozole80$1,684
Letrozole65$1,220
Ondansetron Hcl39$1,123
Tamoxifen Citrate31$675
Gabapentin44$422
Prochlorperazine Maleate25$418
Dexamethasone12$263
Lidocaine-PrilocaineLidocaine/Prilocaine17$237
Famotidine11$26

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
BayerNubeqa$22$177,35913 claims
NovartisFemara$21$10,30212 claims
PfizerEliquis$55$8,74515 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 65th percentile of 1,363 hematology & oncology providers in California.

Other hematology & oncology in South Pasadena

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →