RxDoctor Payments Data

Brian Lee, MD

Transplant Hepatology · San Bernardino, CANPI 1346583242

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $29,093 of the $35,437 with a category attached, or 82.1%. Novo Nordisk accounts for 84.9% of it on its own, with 13 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2024 at $17,133 and has fallen 83.2% since, to $2,873 in 2025.

$35,437in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 46 payments — averaging $770.37 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novo Nordisk$30K
  • Cook Incorporated$2K
  • Novo Nordisk AS$2K
  • Gilead$339
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC$249
  • Osteomed LLC$157
  • plus $659 from 8 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$29,09382%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$2,3507%
  • Travel & lodging$2,3297%
  • Food & beverage$1,5094%
  • Education$1570%

General payments by program year

21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$35,437 in reported general payments places this provider in the 75th percentile of 39 transplant hepatology providers in California.

See all transplant hepatology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$81,463
Medicare patients
291
Services billed
691

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
XifaxanRifaximin58$182,393
VemlidyTenofovir Alafenamide29$42,611
Ursodiol91$12,737
Entecavir43$10,027
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate50$5,387
Spironolactone100$950
ConstuloseLactulose11$837
Lactulose21$700
Azathioprine18$674
Pantoprazole Sodium52$480
Carvedilol112$425
Furosemide102$363
Prednisone25$296
Omeprazole31$257
Bumetanide14$253

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Salix Pharmaceuticals, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLCXifaxan$249$182,39358 claims
GileadVemlidy$339$42,61129 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 75th percentile of 39 transplant hepatology providers in California.

Other transplant hepatology in San Bernardino

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →