RxDoctor Payments Data

Avina Singh, MD

Hematology & Oncology · Burnsville, MNNPI 1821201666

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by grants: $120 of the $168 with a category attached, or 71.6%. AbbVie accounts for 71.6% of it on its own, with 3 other manufacturers making up the rest. 2022 is the largest year on record at $142, more than ten times the $14 reported in 2019. That places this record below the midpoint for hematology & oncology clinicians in MN, where the typical reported total is $238.

$168in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 4 payments — averaging $41.91 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AbbVie$120
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$22
  • Boehringer Ingelheim$14
  • Gilead$12
$379,153in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 4 payments — averaging $94,788 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AstraZeneca$369K
  • Pfizer$10K

What the payments were for

  • Grants$12072%
  • Food & beverage$148%
  • Education$3420%

General payments by program year

19
21
22

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$168 in reported general payments places this provider in the 40th percentile of 193 hematology & oncology providers in Minnesota.

See all hematology & oncology providers in Minnesota

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$3,876,633
Medicare patients
430
Services billed
163,618

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
RevlimidLenalidomide48$884,767
CalquenceAcalabrutinib Maleate48$701,567
IbrancePalbociclib36$557,241
KisqaliRibociclib Succinate22$328,821
JakafiRuxolitinib Phosphate15$248,199
AlecensaAlectinib Hcl13$217,016
VerzenioAbemaciclib14$206,454
ImbruvicaIbrutinib13$203,598
NinlaroIxazomib Citrate13$160,710
VenclextaVenetoclax23$135,150
XareltoRivaroxaban56$67,779
EliquisApixaban53$48,688
Imatinib Mesylate13$20,129
Letrozole349$8,934
Exemestane32$6,472

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieVenclexta$120$135,15023 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 40th percentile of 193 hematology & oncology providers in Minnesota.

Other hematology & oncology in Burnsville

See the full list for Minnesota

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →