RxDoctor Payments Data

Asal Naderi, MD

Allergy & Immunology · Los Angeles, CANPI 1275859027

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $2,500 of the $3,851 with a category attached, or 64.9%. Optinose US, Inc. accounts for 92.3% of it on its own, with 6 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $3,660 and has fallen 98.9% since, to $41 in 2025.

$3,851in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 18 payments — averaging $213.96 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Optinose US, Inc.$4K
  • GSK$132
  • Tersera Therapeutics LLC$41
  • Bio Products Laboratory USA, Inc.$41
  • AstraZeneca$33
  • Novartis$32
  • plus $19 from 1 others
$67,641in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 6 payments — averaging $11,274 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AstraZeneca$68K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$2,50065%
  • Travel & lodging$92824%
  • Food & beverage$42311%

General payments by program year

19
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Optinose US, Inc.7$3,554
GSK6$132
Tersera Therapeutics LLC1$41
Bio Products Laboratory USA, Inc.1$41
AstraZeneca1$33
Novartis1$32
Mindray DS USA, Inc.1$19

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,851 in reported general payments places this provider in the 55th percentile of 426 allergy & immunology providers in California.

See all allergy & immunology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$56,322
Medicare patients
144
Services billed
3,171

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
XolairOmalizumab28$174,692
Dupixent PenDupilumab19$66,868
Gamunex-CImmune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 4611$59,516
Cromolyn Sodium42$14,578
Trelegy ElliptaFluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter19$12,655
Epinephrine28$6,276
Ipratropium Bromide43$1,095
Azelastine Hcl29$713
Albuterol Sulfate HfaAlbuterol Sulfate24$648
Hydroxyzine Hcl28$541
Montelukast Sodium12$264
Fluticasone Propionate24$250
Famotidine12$121

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
GSKTrelegy Ellipta$132$12,65519 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 55th percentile of 426 allergy & immunology providers in California.

Other allergy & immunology in Los Angeles

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →