RxDoctor Payments Data

Arvin Narula, MD

Interventional Cardiology · San Diego, CANPI 1144535709

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — consulting fees (37.5%), speaking fees and food and beverage — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 60 manufacturers reported payments, led by Shockwave Medical, Inc at 44.5% of the total. 2025 is the largest year on record at $48,621, 6.1 times the $7,991 reported in 2019. Among interventional cardiology clinicians in CA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$162,857in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 905 payments — averaging $179.95 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Shockwave Medical, Inc$73K
  • Edwards Lifesciences$23K
  • Medtronic$16K
  • Abiomed$15K
  • Penumbra, Inc.$11K
  • Abbott$5K
  • plus $20K from 54 others
$121,825in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 63 payments — averaging $1933.74 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • CSL Behring$93K
  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC$29K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$61,14438%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$49,43530%
  • Travel & lodging$17,99011%
  • Food & beverage$34,20421%
  • Education$840%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Shockwave Medical, Inc63$72,508
Edwards Lifesciences81$23,489
Medtronic(2 entities)127$16,031
Abiomed43$14,906
Penumbra, Inc.29$10,574
Abbott118$4,815
ZOLL Services LLC (a/k/a ZOLL Lifecor Corp)68$3,965
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.9$2,052
Inari Medical, Inc.28$1,795
Philips North America LLC32$1,522
Livanova USA, Inc.1$1,400
Boston Scientific36$1,277
Terumo Medical Corporation7$987
AstraZeneca30$780
Cardiovascular Systems Inc.14$763
Novartis31$609
Endologix LLC1$498
Johnson & Johnson36$466
Cvrx, Inc.7$311
Biotronik Inc.11$294
Cathworks, Inc.4$222
Merck11$206
Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC8$204
Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.6$186
Imperative Care, Inc6$180
Acutus Medical, Inc.1$170
Biosense Webster, Inc.2$167
Amgen9$159
Asahi Intecc USA, Inc.1$149
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.6$145
EKOS Corporation1$139
Cordis US CORP.2$137
E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.3$128
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1$120
Cook Medical LLC4$113
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc.6$106
ZOLL Circulation Inc1$98
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.5$98
Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.12$95
Pfizer4$92
Heartflow, Inc.2$82
Tactile Systems Technology Inc5$80
Novo Nordisk4$78
Irhythm Technologies, Inc.2$72
Boehringer Ingelheim3$66
Reflow Medical Inc1$49
Cardiva Medical, Inc.3$49
Bayer3$47
Vifor Pharma, Inc.1$40
Daiichi Sankyo Inc.2$36
Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc.1$35
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.2$34
CSL Behring1$30
Kestra Medical Technology Services, Inc.1$27
Angiodynamics, Inc.1$26
Recor Medical Inc1$25
United Therapeutics Corporation1$23
Gilead1$21
Altathera Pharmaceuticals LLC1$19
GSK1$18

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$162,857 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 585 interventional cardiology providers in California.

See all interventional cardiology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$462,726
Medicare patients
1,217
Services billed
3,408

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban100$123,825
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan48$78,635
JardianceEmpagliflozin35$53,914
BrilintaTicagrelor38$36,466
XareltoRivaroxaban34$34,421
Repatha SureclickEvolocumab14$19,514
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol11$17,873
VascepaIcosapent Ethyl13$13,860
Ezetimibe66$3,330
Valsartan126$3,293
Rosuvastatin Calcium125$3,270
Atorvastatin Calcium225$3,034
Metoprolol Succinate130$1,922
Bumetanide22$1,015
Carvedilol135$976

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$92$123,825100 claims
NovartisEntresto$609$78,63548 claims
AstraZenecaBrilinta, Farxiga$780$54,33949 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$66$53,91435 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$466$34,42134 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 585 interventional cardiology providers in California.

Other interventional cardiology in San Diego

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →