RxDoctor Payments Data

Anthony Oro, MD

Dermatology · Stanford, CANPI 1902963853

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $3,100 of the $3,186 with a category attached, or 97.3%. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. accounts for 97.3% of it on its own, with 2 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2020 at $3,100 and has fallen 99.1% since, to $26 in 2024.

$3,186in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 5 payments — averaging $637.18 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.$3K
  • AbbVie$55
  • Pfizer$31
$470,000in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 4 payments — averaging $117,500 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • LEO Pharma AS$270K
  • AbbVie$200K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$3,10097%
  • Food & beverage$552%
  • Education$311%

General payments by program year

20
22
23
24

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.1$3,100
AbbVie2$55
Pfizer2$31

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,186 in reported general payments places this provider in the 60th percentile of 1,875 dermatology providers in California.

See all dermatology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$21,244
Medicare patients
114
Services billed
245

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
LitfuloRitlecitinib Tosylate11$43,440
Minoxidil320$4,401
Finasteride159$1,939
Dutasteride68$1,886
Clobetasol Propionate29$1,302
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate31$975
Fluocinonide21$817
Ketoconazole38$467
Doxycycline Hyclate15$407

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerLitfulo$31$43,44011 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 60th percentile of 1,875 dermatology providers in California.

Other dermatology in Stanford

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →