RxDoctor Payments Data

Anthony Demaria, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · San Diego, CANPI 1124043948

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $13,200 of the $21,042 with a category attached, or 62.7%. Jenavalve Technology, Inc. accounts for 63.2% of it on its own, with 6 other manufacturers making up the rest. 2023 is the largest year on record at $15,719, more than ten times the $54 reported in 2019.

$21,042in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 11 payments — averaging $1912.93 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Jenavalve Technology, Inc.$13K
  • ZOLL Services LLC (a/k/a ZOLL Lifecor Corp)$8K
  • Novo Nordisk$128
  • Akcea Therapeutics, Inc.$36
  • Pfizer$33
  • AstraZeneca$31
  • plus $22 from 1 others
$381,049in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 23 payments — averaging $16,567 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Novartis$286K
  • Akcea Therapeutics, Inc.$95K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$13,20063%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$7,50036%
  • Food & beverage$3422%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$21,042 in reported general payments places this provider in the 85th percentile of 2,184 cardiovascular disease providers in California.

See all cardiovascular disease providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$82,054
Medicare patients
522
Services billed
975

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban106$150,894
Repatha SureclickEvolocumab56$43,920
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan37$40,941
XareltoRivaroxaban18$26,336
JardianceEmpagliflozin18$24,432
TrulicityDulaglutide11$12,690
Candesartan Cilexetil35$3,290
Atorvastatin Calcium206$2,617
Rosuvastatin Calcium75$1,990
Ezetimibe29$1,813
Metoprolol Succinate66$1,516
SotalolSotalol Hcl37$1,142
Amlodipine Besylate121$920
ClopidogrelClopidogrel Bisulfate46$821
Isosorbide Mononitrate ErIsosorbide Mononitrate22$671

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$33$150,894106 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 85th percentile of 2,184 cardiovascular disease providers in California.

Other cardiovascular disease in San Diego

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →