RxDoctor Payments DataLook up a doctor →

Anna Chang, MD

Internal Medicine · Concord, CANPI 1568402931

Payments from drug & device makers

$5,217,546in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 3,211 payments — averaging $1624.90 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Eli Lilly$2.9M
  • Senseonics, Incorporated$1.2M
  • Novo Nordisk AS$712K
  • Sanofi US Services Inc.$201K
  • Novartis$121K
  • Dexcom, Inc.$84K
  • plus $54K from 22 others
$23,953in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 20 payments — averaging $1197.66 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Eli Lilly$22K
  • Sanofi US Services Inc.$2K

What the payments were for

  • Travel & lodging$4,04453%
  • Food & beverage$3,52547%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$5,217,546 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 13,581 internal medicine providers in California.

See all internal medicine providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$257,344
Medicare patients
671
Services billed
8,701

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
JardianceEmpagliflozin215$301,045
OzempicSemaglutide185$251,606
MounjaroTirzepatide126$170,801
TrulicityDulaglutide90$159,744
RybelsusSemaglutide43$87,301
JanuviaSitagliptin Phosphate39$57,769
SomavertPegvisomant11$51,353
Tresiba Flextouch U-100Insulin Degludec62$42,060
Omnipod 5 Dexg7g6 Pods (Gen 5)Insulin Pump Cart,auto,bt,g6/720$31,239
Tresiba Flextouch U-200Insulin Degludec14$21,612
HumalogInsulin Lispro37$19,690
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol12$14,421
Humalog Kwikpen U-100Insulin Lispro40$10,783
Toujeo SolostarInsulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog15$10,664
Fiasp FlextouchInsulin Aspart (Niacinamide)15$10,158

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Lilly USA, LLCMounjaro, Trulicity, Humalog$115$350,235253 claims
Novo NordiskOzempic, Rybelsus, Novolog$628$343,581240 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$179$301,045215 claims
MerckJanuvia$184$57,76939 claims
AstraZenecaFarxiga$46$14,42112 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 13,581 internal medicine providers in California.

Other internal medicine in Concord

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →