RxDoctor Payments Data

Anil Shah

Cardiovascular Disease · Hollywood, MDNPI 1730108069

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 92.3% of the total across 215 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 28 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 12.7% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $1,187 and has fallen 59.7% since, to $479 in 2025.

$4,472in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 215 payments — averaging $20.80 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novartis$566
  • Merck$531
  • Amgen$491
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$408
  • Pfizer$385
  • Boehringer Ingelheim$309
  • plus $2K from 22 others
$78,029in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 14 payments — averaging $5573.50 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Genentech, Inc.$78K

What the payments were for

  • Speaking & faculty fees$3257%
  • Food & beverage$4,12792%
  • Education$200%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$4,472 in reported general payments places this provider in the 70th percentile of 507 cardiovascular disease providers in Maryland.

See all cardiovascular disease providers in Maryland

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$1,041,373
Medicare patients
3,186
Services billed
13,890

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban386$491,937
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan103$143,997
MultaqDronedarone Hcl42$81,534
XareltoRivaroxaban51$74,424
Rosuvastatin Calcium386$7,427
Dabigatran EtexilateDabigatran Etexilate Mesylate21$7,046
Metoprolol Succinate376$6,822
BrilintaTicagrelor11$5,754
Candesartan Cilexetil63$5,392
Nifedipine ErNifedipine136$5,225
Ranolazine ErRanolazine54$4,673
Atorvastatin Calcium304$3,816
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd)Diltiazem Hcl91$3,147
Amiodarone Hcl69$2,494
Ezetimibe79$2,174

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$385$491,937386 claims
NovartisEntresto$566$143,997103 claims
Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLCMultaq$228$81,53442 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$142$74,42451 claims
AstraZenecaBrilinta$140$5,75411 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 70th percentile of 507 cardiovascular disease providers in Maryland.

Other cardiovascular disease in Hollywood

See the full list for Maryland

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →