RxDoctor Payments DataLook up a doctor →

Andrew Menkes, MD

Procedural Dermatology · Mountain View, CANPI 1306905088

Payments from drug & device makers

$16,571in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 742 payments — averaging $22.33 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AbbVie$3K
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.$2K
  • Johnson & Johnson$1K
  • Lilly USA, LLC$1K
  • LEO Pharma Inc.$1K
  • UCB, Inc.$1K
  • plus $7K from 39 others

What the payments were for

  • Speaking & faculty fees$360%
  • Food & beverage$15,56794%
  • Education$9686%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$16,571 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 108 procedural dermatology providers in California.

See all procedural dermatology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$579,965
Medicare patients
536
Services billed
6,258

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Humira(Cf) PenAdalimumab14$88,612
Dupixent PenDupilumab14$50,424
JubliaEfinaconazole21$16,964
Betamethasone Diprop AugmentedBetamethasone/Propylene Glyc58$1,630
Tranexamic Acid15$1,451
Halobetasol Propionate15$1,138
CiclopiroxCiclopirox Olamine23$744
Ketoconazole54$525
Desonide12$453
Cephalexin22$412
Minoxidil42$376
Minocycline Hcl18$321
Fluticasone Propionate19$274
Mupirocin34$252
Triamcinolone Acetonide13$115

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Ortho Dermatologics, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLCJublia$246$16,96421 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 108 procedural dermatology providers in California.

Other procedural dermatology in Mountain View

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →