RxDoctor Payments Data

Anand Ganesan, MD

Dermatology · Orange, CANPI 1104895580

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $10,317 of the $10,336 with a category attached, or 99.8%. AbbVie accounts for 71.5% of it on its own, with 2 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2022 at $4,394 and has fallen 99.6% since, to $19 in 2025.

$10,336in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 6 payments — averaging $1722.71 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AbbVie$7K
  • Avita Medical Americas, LLC$3K
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.$19
$2,393,630in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 204 payments — averaging $11,733 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AbbVie$1M
  • Incyte Corporation$766K
  • Avita Medical Americas, LLC$570K
  • Pfizer$13K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$10,317100%
  • Food & beverage$190%

General payments by program year

19
22
23
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
AbbVie(2 entities)3$7,394
Avita Medical Americas, LLC2$2,923
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.1$19

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$10,336 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 1,875 dermatology providers in California.

See all dermatology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$39,447
Medicare patients
127
Services billed
381

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
RinvoqUpadacitinib13$81,633
OpzeluraRuxolitinib Phosphate38$73,237
Dupixent SyringeDupilumab14$56,731
Tacrolimus11$1,666
Clobetasol Propionate18$1,132
Tranexamic Acid13$865
MethotrexateMethotrexate Sodium30$512
Mycophenolate Mofetil15$505
Clobetasol EmollientClobetasol Propionate/Emoll11$295
Ciclopirox13$218
Spironolactone14$189
Dexamethasone11$184
Triamcinolone Acetonide19$159

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieRinvoq$7,394$81,63313 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 1,875 dermatology providers in California.

Other dermatology in Orange

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →