RxDoctor Payments Data

Amie Neumaier Neumaier

Gerontology · McFarland, WINPI 1568168920

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by speaking fees: $155,538 of the $172,405 with a category attached, or 90.2%. Galderma Laboratories, L.p. accounts for 69.2% of it on its own, with 2 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2023 at $71,444 and has fallen 53.6% since, to $33,149 in 2025. Among gerontology clinicians in WI with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$172,405in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 317 payments — averaging $543.87 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Galderma Laboratories, L.p.$119K
  • AbbVie$53K
  • Revance Therapeutics, Inc.$53

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$6700%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$155,53890%
  • Travel & lodging$11,1166%
  • Food & beverage$5,0653%
  • Education$170%

General payments by program year

23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Galderma Laboratories, L.p.192$119,285
AbbVie122$53,067
Revance Therapeutics, Inc.3$53

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$172,405 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 64 gerontology providers in Wisconsin.

See all gerontology providers in Wisconsin

Other gerontology in McFarland

See the full list for Wisconsin

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →